Batzner, Jan, Nelaturu, Sree Harsha, Kornilova, Anastassia, Crall, Jon, Cerruti, Tommaso, Long, Yanan, Mai, Yifan, Ahuja, Sanchit, Yehudai, Asaf, Šuppa, Marek, Lalor, John P., Olowe, Oluwagbemike, Ganhotra, Jatin, Hu, Brian H., Habba, Eliya, Bean, Andrew M., Liu, Chang, Land, Sander, Dillmann, Steven, Garikaparthi, Aniketh, Bandel, Elron, Imai, Saki, Edgell, James, Kennedy, Wm. Matthew, Chim, Jenny, Meusling, Patrick, Kaeberlein, Asteria, Chundi, Venkata Ramachandra Karthik, Patwardhan, Manasi, Ku, Martin, Meek, Austin, Knauer, Leon, Wingenroth, Brian, Yadav, Srishti, Gohar, Usman, Friedrich, Felix, Lin, Michelle, Mickel, Jennifer, Cohan, Arman, Biderman, Stella, Solaiman, Irene, Talat, Zeerak, Reuel, Anka, Akhtar, Mubashara, Kasneci, Gjergji, Ghosh, Avijit, Choshen, Leshem
Abstract
AI evaluations are widely used for testing and understanding progress. However, the diverse evaluators bring with them inconsistencies that challenge analysis and comparison. First, results are saved in incompatible formats, scattered across leaderboards, papers, blog posts, evaluation harness logs, and custom repositories. Second, results are created by different evaluation frameworks, which produce divergent scores for nominally identical evaluations and record metadata inconsistently, hindering comparison, cross-community evaluation science, cost reduction, and reuse. We introduce Every Eval Ever, the first shared schema and community-crowdsourced repository for AI evaluation results. The schema standardizes how evaluations are represented in a unified, single JSON document. It is source-agnostic by design, ingesting results from evaluation harnesses and papers alike, and optionally stores per-instance outputs for fine-grained analysis. We contribute: (i) a community-governed metadata schema with a companion instance-level schema, the first standardization effort of its kind; (ii) automatic converters from popular formats, evaluation harnesses, and leaderboards to the unified schema; and (iii) a crowdsourced community database hosted on Hugging Face, currently spanning to date 22,235 models, 2,273 unique benchmarks, and 31 evaluation formats.
Chinese Translation
人工智能评估广泛用于测试和理解进展。然而,多样化的评估者带来了不一致性,挑战了分析和比较。首先,结果以不兼容的格式保存,分散在排行榜、论文、博客文章、评估工具日志和自定义存储库中。其次,结果由不同的评估框架生成,这些框架对名义上相同的评估产生不同的分数,并且不一致地记录元数据,从而妨碍了比较、跨社区评估科学、成本降低和重用。我们介绍了Every Eval Ever,这是第一个共享架构和社区众包的人工智能评估结果存储库。该架构标准化了评估在统一的单一JSON文档中的表示方式。它在设计上与来源无关,可以从评估工具和论文中获取结果,并可选择性地存储每个实例的输出以进行细粒度分析。我们的贡献包括:(i)一个由社区管理的元数据架构及其伴随的实例级架构,这是此类标准化工作的首次尝试;(ii)从流行格式、评估工具和排行榜到统一架构的自动转换器;以及(iii)一个托管在Hugging Face上的众包社区数据库,目前涵盖22,235个模型、2,273个独特基准和31种评估格式。